In team sports, uniforms are an essential part of competing – not only do they distinguish a group of players from the opposing side, but they also help foster teamwork and team spirit. Their message: “We’re all in this together!” And deviating from the dress code – perhaps by donning a wrong color sock – might place you on the sidelines.
It’s a different story when athletes compete individually. But even in nonteam sports there are often protocols and guidelines to be followed when it comes to proper attire, especially if there are sponsors to answer to.
Yet there are some athletes who simply don’t care. They seem more interested in shocking than winning. (Of course, a fair number of them have managed to accomplish both.)
Let’s take, for instance, tennis, that once-genteel sport steeped in tradition. The tennis whites have long prevailed as acceptable apparel. However, over the years a number of prominent players have appeared on the courts in a multitude of outlandish or inappropriate costumes. Not only do they look unprofessional and even silly, but they create an unfair distraction for their opponents. And worse, they make a mockery of the sport, setting a bad example for the younger players and fans.
The Willams sisters are prime offenders. Last year at the French Open, Venus Williams wore an outfit that looked like it came straight out of a Victoria’s Secret catalog: a racy black-and-red-lace jumper paired with skintight flesh-colored shorts that left her (albeit taut) derriere nearly visible for all to see.
Said she: “Lace has never been done before in tennis, and I've been wanting to do it for a long time.” (There’s probably a very good reason why that’s so, Venus.) Earlier this year, she treated the crowd at the Australian Open to a bright-yellow latticelike dress, also with visible skin-tone undies.
Her sister, Serena, six years before chose a denim skirt and black boots to wear at the U.S. Open. Was she expecting rain?
And at the 2006 U.S. Open, Maria Sharapova, their rival, opted for a black-sequined cocktail dress. She must have had a big date immediately after the match.
The male players don’t fare much better. At the Australian Open in 2006, Dominik Hrbaty donned a pink and black polo shirt with two huge holes cut out in the back. I guess he was hot. That same year, Radek Stepanek, clad in a black-and-white striped shirt, looked more like a linesman than a player in the Zagreb Indoors ATP Tournament.
The first women to play at Wimbeldon, the world’s oldest tennis tournament, wore full-length white dresses; the men wore full-length white pants. Wimbeldon still requires its players to wear all white (though, admittedly, tournament organizers can’t control the style of the outfits). It also imposes a strict dress code on others involved in the championship tournament, like the chair umpires and the ball boys and girls. (Spectators are spared a dress policy, though they have their own rules to abide by.)
The United States Tennis Association, the governing body for tennis in this country, doesn’t have an all-white rule, though it says it requires "proper tennis attire" for all sanctioned USTA tournaments and matches. But the word "proper" is not clearly defined.
It’s time for the USTA, as well as the tennis associations in other countries, to crack down on inappropriate tennis attire and restore a little class to the sport by spelling out specific guidelines. Doing so would create a more level playing field for all of the players, and keep the attention where it should be, on the game. As for those badly dressed folks, remember: not all your fans love-love.
Sadie -
ReplyDeleteSo are you for athletes dressing anyway they want, and this is your Devil's Advocate stance?
I handled mine differently but I think this works.
I like your proactive voice in this, you almost come across as severely pissed off, which grabbed my attention. Interesting that you used tennis as a sample sport - you do see a lot of crazy outfits. I am a tennis player myself and I learned from other players at my club that certain colors do actually throw off the vision of an opponent. Ex. would be red. Somehow, players wearing red shirts seem to move more than players wearing softer colors. Poaching while wearing red can trick an opponent (poaching happens in double where the net player moves across the court to intercept a returned ball).
I somewhat agree with you on your stance but I think many of these pro players will wear whatever they want, especially if it is sponsored. For the women I think some of them do like to shock - not only other players but the entire crowd. Tennis is one of those sports where everyone has their eyes on you most of the time, so what you wear has a big impact.
"...once-genteel sport..." Not sure this line is necessary. Was it once genteel? Can you prove that?
The tennis whites you refer to as acceptable attire - acceptable for tennis, or everyday? Clothing for all sports has changed - look at football.
You might be going a little far when you mention the USTA having sanctions on dress attire. Also, what is classy? You did make a point about the older white uniforms but does that make them classy? Shouldn't players be defined for their athletic ability, not by how they dress? I don't think how a player dresses has anything to do with the fairness of the match, or the skill required to win.
Would like to see the details on the Wimbeldon dress codes.
Thanks for sharing Sadie - this is a strong, vigorous stance on athletic attire.
I agree with Drake about your proactive voice! It really makes this a interesting read because there is a passion emanating from the words and the way you use them.
ReplyDeleteA good example is "And at the 2006 U.S. Open, Maria Sharapova, their rival, opted for a black-sequined cocktail dress. She must have had a big date immediately after the match." The use of sarcasm also heightens the feelings that you have towards the new fashion in the tennis world.
The use of fact in this sentence; "The United States Tennis Association, the governing body for tennis in this country, doesn’t have an all-white rule, though it says it requires "proper tennis attire" for all sanctioned USTA tournaments and matches. But the word "proper" is not clearly defined." worked because it meshed the facts with your opinion in the same train of thought.
Great closing.
ReplyDeleteHow do you feel about ledes, or leads? I find even journalists bury them regularly, which surprises me. A headline can do the work of a lede, but I don’t think it should work alone. I regularly read two or three paragraphs into an article’s opening before the reporter gets to the overall point. It is usually that an opening story reveals the point.
That technique must lose the interactive reader and it isn’t necessary. Journalism was founded on the lede. Right?
But I digress. The Devil’s Advocate assignment is more about a wild first draft than a tight structure. Your thesis felt late though. Your opening about what role uniforms play could come after your thesis that they are being abused.
I’m questioning parentheses, every since I read this article on em dashes - http://www.slate.com/id/2295413/. Now, whenever I use either, I realize my aside (and I make a lot of them) is a complete thought deserving its own beat or unnecessary.
Do you write funny? Is that the experiment here? This is funny. It gets funny. It is more of an article up front. The one liners come later.
I thought the 9-11 piece took risks in a different way. I heard a voice in there that didn’t nail much down by the end, in terms of material and slivers of ice, but it was clearly more personal and more injured than the voice going through recovery. It was searching and that is what I’m searching for with this assignment.
Good work.